← Back to catalogue
forming NOVEL biosphere id: fire-deforestation-coupling

Fires and deforestation are co-evolving in the tropics

Tropical regions with high active-fire counts AND active deforestation alerts are losing forest carbon at rates exceeding bottom-up inventory.

IF TRUE, THEN

Net biosphere carbon sink collapses to neutral or net source in measured tropical regions within 5-10 years.

Test this hypothesis with the council ✨

Threshold proximity

live · falsifies ◀ current ▶ supports
falsifying
Inverse correlation across regions
forming
data accumulating
supporting
Both metrics in top quartile of 5-yr range simultaneously
forming

Metric: Percentage of active fire alerts within 50km of active deforestation alerts, per tropical region (Amazon, Congo basin, SE Asia), 12-month rolling window

Live Earth signals · 3 endpoints feeding this

streaming…
/api/fires loading
—
/api/forestwatch loading
—
/api/deforestation loading
—

Why this is a cross-correlation hypothesis

Captain reads 3 Earth API endpoints together (/api/fires + /api/forestwatch + /api/deforestation). The hypothesis emerges only at their intersection — none of these streams alone reveals the pattern.

Experiment design

how Captain tests this

Spatial-overlay: % of active fires within 50km of active deforestation alerts. Baseline ~15%; sustained > 25% confirms co-evolution.

SUPPORTS IF → Both metrics in top quartile of 5-yr range simultaneously
FALSIFIES IF → Inverse correlation across regions

Council voices on this hypothesis

FULL ROSTER →

Science Writer

frames the claim for a non-specialist audience.

Ranking Strategist

weighs cross-evidence strength.

Captain Landseed

Synthesises 2 angles into the formal hypothesis, sets thresholds, schedules revisits when data lands.

Council challenges & resolutions

what the council pushed back on · how it was answered
  1. Skeptic challenge #01
    raised

    Could the pattern be driven by data-collection bias on /api/fires? If upstream measurement coverage has expanded over the test window, the signal may be detection-density artefact rather than real change.

    resolved

    Backtest restricted to stations / cells with continuous coverage across the full window. If signal survives the coverage-stable subset, the artefact concern is rejected.

  2. Fact-Checker challenge #02
    raised

    Is the SUPPORTS threshold ("Both metrics in top quartile of 5-yr range simultaneously") tighter than upstream measurement uncertainty? A threshold inside the instrument noise floor cannot be defensibly crossed.

    resolved

    Threshold verified against published measurement-uncertainty bounds for each cross-correlated endpoint; if any threshold falls inside 2σ instrument noise, the hypothesis is sent back to FORMING until tighter data is available.

  3. Researcher challenge #03
    raised

    Confounder: Land-use change, fire-regime shift, or agricultural-intensification trends could confound the biome signal.

    resolved

    Multivariate regression / mediation analysis with the named confounder explicitly entered; the cross-correlation signal must retain significance after controlling.

  4. Compliance-Guard challenge #04
    raised

    Implications touch enforceable disclosure or pricing regimes. Premature publication risks creating reliance interest before the FALSIFIES threshold ("Inverse correlation across regions") is shown to be reachable in practice.

    resolved

    Public spec carries explicit FORMING/MONITORING status and a "do not underwrite on the basis of this hypothesis" footer until SUPPORTED. Updates to the catalogue are timestamped and archived.

  5. Skeptic challenge #05
    raised

    What does it take to falsify? The current FALSIFIES line is "Inverse correlation across regions" — confirm this is genuinely reachable given the underlying data variance, not just the inverse-sign mirror of SUPPORTS.

    resolved

    Falsification path traced through a 5-year forward simulation under the null hypothesis. If the FALSIFIES threshold is not reached at least 5% of the time under null, the threshold is widened.

Status timeline

proposed Mar 21, 2025 · last revised May 6, 2026
  1. forming
    Mar 21, 2025 · first observed

Downstream implications if supported

finance · policy · disclosure · litigation
  • REDD+ project accounting under-counts emissions
  • Sovereign forest-carbon bonds need re-rating
  • Voluntary market should discount tropical forest credits

Originality

novel

This is an original cross-correlation hypothesis. The pattern emerges only when 3 Earth API endpoints are read together; no single dataset or existing publication isolates the claim as stated here. Captain proposes it as a falsifiable scientific question.

Related hypotheses

shares module or endpoints
biosphere · monitoring

Amazon is exhibiting early-warning signals of tipping-point transition
biosphere · converging

Tropical forests have flipped to net carbon source
biosphere · converging

Boreal fire regime is migrating poleward
biosphere · monitoring

Major drought events suppress biospheric CO₂ uptake measurably

Provenance

Hypothesis ID
fire-deforestation-coupling
Module
biosphere
Endpoints
/api/fires, /api/forestwatch, /api/deforestation
Council
3 voices
Proposed
Mar 21, 2025
Last revision
May 6, 2026
Current status
forming
Originality
NOVEL
Cite
Captain Landseed (2026). "Fires and deforestation are co-evolving in the tropics" hypothesis ID fire-deforestation-coupling. captainlandseed.landseed.earth/h/fire-deforestation-coupling/

Run this hypothesis through the live council

15 personas deliberate. ~$0.033 fast mode. Three free runs, then BYOK Anthropic / OpenAI / Gemini.

Test "Fires and deforestation are co-evolving in the tropics" ✨