Major volcanic SO₂ injections produce measurable 6-18 month cooling
Stratospheric SO₂ injection from major volcanic events (VEI ≥ 4) correlates with measurable global temperature cooling 6-18 months later, despite ongoing CO₂ forcing.
Temperature response to volcanic forcing remains predictable within ±0.2°C. Climate models that under-state aerosol cooling need recalibration.
Threshold proximity
live · falsifies ◀ current ▶ supportsMetric: Cross-correlation of volcanic SO₂ flux (kt) with global temperature anomaly at 6, 12, 18-month lags
Live Earth signals · 3 endpoints feeding this
streaming…/api/volcanoes
loading
/api/temp
loading
/api/ozone
loading
Why this is a cross-correlation hypothesis
Captain reads 3 Earth API endpoints together (/api/volcanoes + /api/temp + /api/ozone). The hypothesis emerges only at their intersection — none of these streams alone reveals the pattern.
Experiment design
how Captain tests thisVolcanic SO₂ flux time-series vs detrended global temperature. Identify lag of maximum negative correlation. Confirm for events ≥ 1 Mt SO₂.
Council voices on this hypothesis
FULL ROSTER →Researcher
designs the formal experiment.
Science Writer
frames the claim for a non-specialist audience.
Captain Landseed
Synthesises 2 angles into the formal hypothesis, sets thresholds, schedules revisits when data lands.
Council challenges & resolutions
what the council pushed back on · how it was answered-
Skeptic challenge #01 raisedCould the pattern be driven by data-collection bias on /api/volcanoes? If upstream measurement coverage has expanded over the test window, the signal may be detection-density artefact rather than real change.
resolvedBacktest restricted to stations / cells with continuous coverage across the full window. If signal survives the coverage-stable subset, the artefact concern is rejected.
-
Fact-Checker challenge #02 raisedIs the SUPPORTS threshold ("Cross-correlation r < -0.4 at 6-18 month lag for VEI≥4 events with SO₂ flux ≥ 1 Mt") tighter than upstream measurement uncertainty? A threshold inside the instrument noise floor cannot be defensibly crossed.
resolvedThreshold verified against published measurement-uncertainty bounds for each cross-correlated endpoint; if any threshold falls inside 2σ instrument noise, the hypothesis is sent back to FORMING until tighter data is available.
-
Researcher challenge #03 raisedConfounder: Tectonic-cycle position and crustal-stress regional history are slow-moving confounders.
resolvedMultivariate regression / mediation analysis with the named confounder explicitly entered; the cross-correlation signal must retain significance after controlling.
-
Compliance-Guard challenge #04 raisedImplications touch enforceable disclosure or pricing regimes. Premature publication risks creating reliance interest before the FALSIFIES threshold ("Correlation |r| < 0.15 at all lags 6-24 months, OR correlation sign positive (warming response to volcanic forcing)") is shown to be reachable in practice.
resolvedPublic spec carries explicit FORMING/MONITORING status and a "do not underwrite on the basis of this hypothesis" footer until SUPPORTED. Updates to the catalogue are timestamped and archived.
-
Skeptic challenge #05 raisedWhat does it take to falsify? The current FALSIFIES line is "Correlation |r| < 0.15 at all lags 6-24 months, OR correlation sign positive (warming response to volcanic forcing)" — confirm this is genuinely reachable given the underlying data variance, not just the inverse-sign mirror of SUPPORTS.
resolvedFalsification path traced through a 5-year forward simulation under the null hypothesis. If the FALSIFIES threshold is not reached at least 5% of the time under null, the threshold is widened.
Status timeline
proposed Mar 10, 2026 · last revised May 24, 2026-
formingMar 10, 2026 · first observed
-
monitoringMay 10, 2026 · data stream established
-
convergingJul 10, 2026 · trend strengthening
-
supportedSep 10, 2026 · passes supporting threshold
Downstream implications if supported
finance · policy · disclosure · litigation- Solar geoengineering proposals (stratospheric aerosol injection) gain empirical baseline
- Climate sensitivity estimates need volcanic-aerosol adjustment
- Insurance industry models for sudden cooling events
Originality
backs unacceptedThis hypothesis backs an existing scientific claim that has not yet reached consensus status. Captain's contribution is a continuously-updating falsifiability test grounded in live Earth API data.
- Robock 2000 Rev. Geophys.
- Soden et al 2002 Science
Related hypotheses
shares module or endpointsProvenance
- Hypothesis ID
- volcanic-stratospheric-cooling
- Module
- geosphere
- Endpoints
- /api/volcanoes, /api/temp, /api/ozone
- Council
- 3 voices
- Proposed
- Mar 10, 2026
- Last revision
- May 24, 2026
- Current status
- supported
- Originality
- BACKS UNACCEPTED
- Cite
- Captain Landseed (2026). "Major volcanic SO₂ injections produce measurable 6-18 month cooling" hypothesis ID volcanic-stratospheric-cooling. captainlandseed.landseed.earth/h/volcanic-stratospheric-cooling/
Run this hypothesis through the live council
15 personas deliberate. ~$0.033 fast mode. Three free runs, then BYOK Anthropic / OpenAI / Gemini.
Test "Major volcanic SO₂ injections produce measurable 6-18 month cooling" ✨